Ultrasound continuous erector spinae catheter versus paravertebral catheter for pain management in modified radical mastectomy for cancer patients: A randomized double-blind

Adlan, Suzan; Sameh, Eman; Mahmoud, Fatma Hanafi; Gamal, Reham Mohamed; Thabet, Taher

doi:TEJA-2023-0231

Ultrasound continuous erector spinae catheter versus paravertebral catheter for pain management in modified radical mastectomy for cancer patients: A randomized double-blind

Authors

TEJA-2023-0231

Abstract

Background
Regional analgesia provides adequate management of pain during mastectomies and early postoperative period. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising regional technique. This study compared the efficacy of ESPB versus paravertebral block (PVB) catheters for pain management in modified radical mastectomy (MRM).
Methods
This randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study recruited 70 adult female cases planned for MRM. The patients were equally randomized into two groups: group ESPB and group PVB. The blocks were performed before general anesthesia induction with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25%, then 0.1 ml/kg/hr continuous infusion through a catheter.
Results
The duration of block performance was significantly lower in the group ESPB than in the group PVB ( < 0.001). The total morphine consumption in 48 h postoperative was 1.54 ± 3.74 mg in group ESPB and 1.68 ± 3.48 mg in group PVB ( = 0.878). Patients required fentanyl and postoperative morphine in the 1 48 h, time to 1 request analgesia insignificantly differed between groups. Intraoperative and postoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure and oxygen saturation, and visual analog scale at rest and movement insignificantly differed between groups. Postoperative pneumothorax occurred in one case in group PVB and did not occur in group ESPB.
Conclusions
In MRM, analgesic efficacy of preoperative ultrasound-guided ESPB and PVB is comparable, and ESPB is an easier technique and more safer to perform when compared to PVB.

Keywords