Ultrasound guided suprascapular and costoclavicular nerve block versus interscalene nerve block for postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

Kamel, Emad Zarief; Fathy, Golnar M; Talaat, Mohamed; Bakri, Mohamed H.; Soliman, Omar M.; Abd El-Salam, Mohamed Abd El-Radi; Ismail, Eman A.

doi:TEJA-2022-0134

Ultrasound guided suprascapular and costoclavicular nerve block versus interscalene nerve block for postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

Authors

TEJA-2022-0134

Abstract

Background
Suprascapular nerve block (SSB) with costoclavicular nerve block (CCB) could be an ideal hybrid block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in comparison to interscalene nerve block (ISB) regarding postoperative analgesia.
Methods
Fifty adult patients scheduled to undergo elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were equally randomized and enrolled in this study in a 1:1 ratio either to ISB group or diaphragm sparing block DSB (received combined SSB plus CCB blocks). The first numeric pain score (NRS) on awakening was recorded (1), then every 15 minutes over 3 hours. The time to 1st rescue analgesia and the number of patients who required nalbuphine to decrease pain scores below 4/10 were recorded. The incidence of persistent pain after 1 month was recorded as well.
Results
Pain NRS was significantly lower in ISB than DSB group during the early 3 hours postoperatively ( < 0.001). The time to rescue analgesia was significantly longer in group ISB than group DSB (179.50 ± 40.9 versus 57.38 ± 19.57 min, respectively, with = 0.013). The number of patients who required postoperative nalbuphine was significantly fewer in group ISB than group DSB (8 versus 19, respectively, with = 0.004). The incidence of persistent pain after 1 month was insignificant between the two groups.
Conclusions
SSB with CCB offered lower analgesia quality compared to ISB in shoulder surgery.

Keywords